Review of potential environmental consequences of the British Petroleum Deepwater Horizon well blow out spill, April 2010.
An unknown but enormous quantity of crude oil is being released into the Gulf of Mexico from a depth of 5,000ft in the Mississippi Canyon 252 lease block (28o44.20’N, 88o23.23’W). There are many different ecosystems in the Gulf basin, and the extent to which they will be impacted depends on how much oil is released, where it goes, and also how it is treated. Mitigation can take the form of physical barriers or booms that block surface slicks and prevent the oil washing up on shore, igniting slicks to burn them from the surface, and applying dispersant chemicals that break down the surface slicks and allow them to sink in the water column. Oil spill dispersants do not reduce the total amount of oil entering the environment; they simply change the chemical and physical properties of the oil, thereby changing its transport, fate, and potential effects. Dispersants also contain potentially dangerous compounds, but the chemistry of each brand is proprietary so the toxic effects are unknown. Small amounts of oil will disperse naturally into the water column through the action of waves and other environmental processes. The objective of applying dispersant is to increase the amount of oil that physically mixes into the water column, reducing the potential that a surface slick will contaminate shoreline habitats and fauna, or impact organisms that come into contact with the water surface (birds, marine mammals, turtles etc). However, by promoting dispersion of oil into the water column, dispersants increase the potential exposure of water‐column and benthic biota to spilled oil. Dispersant application therefore represents a conscious decision to increase the hydrocarbon load on one component of ...
Bibliography: 1. National Research Council (2005)Oil Spill Dispersants: efficacy and effects. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11283.html : National Research Council, 2005. 2. Shigenaka (2003) Oil and Sea Turtles: biology, planning and response. http://response.restoration.nooa.gov/book_shelf/35_turtle_complete.pdf : NOAA Office of response and Restoration 3. Neff J (2005) Chapter 1. Composition and Fate of Petroleum and Spill‐Treating agents in the marine environment. In: Geraci JR and St Aubin DJ (eds) Synthesis of effects of oil on marine mammals. Minerals Management Service OCS88‐049 4. Anderson JW et al (1974) Characteristics of dispersions and water‐soluble extracts of crude and refined oils and their toxicity to estuarine crustaceans and fish. s.l. : Marine Biology Vol. 27 (1): 75‐88. 5. Fucik K (1994) Dispersed oil toxicity tests with species indigenous to the Gulf of Mexico. Minerals Management Service Publication 94‐0021 6. . Fuller C et al (2004) Comparative toxicity of oil, dispersant, and oil plus dispersant to several marine species. Environmental toxicology and chemistry Vol. 23(12):2941‐2949. 7. Beiras R and L Saco Alvarez (2006) Toxicity of seawater and sand affected by the Prestige fuel‐oil spill using bivalve and sea urchin embryogenesis bioassays. Water air and soil pollution Vol. 177: 457‐466. 8. Benfield and Shaw (2005) Potential spatial and temporal vulnerability of pelagic fish assemblages in the Gulf of Mexico to surface oil spills associated with deepwater petroleum development. US Dept Interior, MMS Gulf of Mexico OCS region, New Orleans. OCS MMS 2005‐012.
9. Davis (2002) Cetacean habitat in the northern oceanic Gulf of Mexico. Deep Sea Research I: Oceanographic research papers Vol 49(1): 121‐142. 10. Geraci JR and St Aubin J (eds) (1988) Synthesis of effects of oil on marine mammals . Atlantic OCS region : Minerals Management Service OCS 88‐049 11. Briggs KT, ME Gershwin and DW Anderson (1997) Consequences of petrochemical ingestion and stress on the immune system of seabirds. ICES journal of Marine Science Vol. 54(4): 718‐7258. 12. Albers PH (2006) Birds and PAHs. Avian and poultry biology review, Vol. 17(4): 125‐140. 13. Lance BK, et al. (2001) An evaluation of marine bird popualation trends following the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Prince William sound Alaska. Marine Pollution Bulletin Vol. 42(4): 298‐309. 14. Culbertson JB et al (2007) Long term biological effects of petroluem residues on fiddler crabs in salt marshes. Marine Pollution Bulletin Vol. 54(7): 955‐962. 15. Donkin P et al (2003) Toxic effects of unresolved complex mixtures of aromatic hydrocarbons accumulated by mussels, Mytilus edulis, from contaminated field sites. Envrionmental science and technology Vol. 37(21): 4825‐4830.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document